<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Westergaard Advertising &#187; Web 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.westerad.com/category/web-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.westerad.com</link>
	<description>A blog about IDEAS+ACTION from Westergaard Advertising</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:02:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Forget the Snacks</title>
		<link>http://www.westerad.com/2009/06/dont-forget-the-snacks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.westerad.com/2009/06/dont-forget-the-snacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 04:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Westergaard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[info snacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storytelling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.westerad.com/?p=1172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love snacks. Snacks are great because they&#8217;re &#8230; well, snacks. Small in size, sweet or salty. One of my favorite pieces of new media marketing vernacular is &#8220;info snacking.&#8221; For those un-indoctrinated, info snacking speaks to all of the little snack-sized bits of our story that we leave out as a sort of a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1174" title="istock_000005716093xsmall" src="http://www.westerad.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/istock_000005716093xsmall.jpg" alt="istock_000005716093xsmall" width="297" height="193" />I love snacks. Snacks are great because they&#8217;re &#8230; well, <em>snacks</em>. Small in size, sweet or salty. One of my favorite pieces of new media marketing vernacular is &#8220;info snacking.&#8221; For those un-indoctrinated, info snacking speaks to all of the little snack-sized bits of our story that we leave out as a sort of a bread-crumb trail leading back to our businesses in the hopes of creating stronger brand engagement. Photo albums on Flickr and Picassa, conversations begun on Facebook and MySpace, stories unraveled on blogs and YouTube — not to mention numerous Tweets. All of these are info snacks that we leave out for a culture that has gradually shifted toward an increasingly steady diet of bite-sized nuggets of content (e.g. Twitter use is up; newspaper subscriptions are down).</p>
<p>On my run this morning (working off more literal snacks), I thought of the work ahead of me when I returned to my desk — editing a video, writing a blog, uploading photos, tweeting across several client accounts. None of these projects resembled creating what we think of as traditional ads. And yet, I think the term &#8217;snacks&#8217; can be misleading. I think the preparation of quality info snacks demands as much craft, devotion, and time as creating traditional modes of commercial messaging. And, as alluded to in our last <a href="http://www.westerad.com/2009/06/why-you-need-a-social-media-strategy-not-a-checklist/">post</a>, you need a recipe if you want it to come out right.</p>
<p>Your guests are hungry. Are you leaving out enough snacks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.westerad.com/2009/06/dont-forget-the-snacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why You Need a Social Media Strategy Not a Checklist</title>
		<link>http://www.westerad.com/2009/06/why-you-need-a-social-media-strategy-not-a-checklist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.westerad.com/2009/06/why-you-need-a-social-media-strategy-not-a-checklist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Westergaard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small business facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small business social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter for business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter for small business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube for small business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.westerad.com/?p=1147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Years ago I worked for a small educational publishing company. As I sat down to begin work on what would ultimately be the first of my two complete overhauls of the company&#8217;s website, I remarked to a colleague that this first website looked like &#8216;creating a website&#8217; had been an item on a to-do list [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1162" title="Marketing Strategy" src="http://www.westerad.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/istock_000007316552xsmall.jpg" alt="Marketing Strategy" width="285" height="198"  />Years ago I worked for a small educational publishing company. As I sat down to begin work on what would ultimately be the first of my two complete overhauls of the company&#8217;s website, I remarked to a colleague that this first website looked like &#8216;creating a website&#8217; had been an item on a to-do list — that they&#8217;d simply created an online business card, checked it off their list, and moved on. That&#8217;s not an indictment as much as it was the way of Web 1.0. Many simply felt they needed to plant a flag on this internet thing and then get back to the real work. Most marketers have seen the error of their ways and have upgraded their website several times as they strive toward a dynamic Web 2.0 experience. Though now there is a different item appearing on those checklists.</p>
<p>In this age of social media, more and more marketers regardless of their understanding of these new channels want &#8220;on that Facebook thing&#8221; in much the same way that the checklist marketers of the early &#8217;90s wanted &#8220;a website on those interwebs.&#8221;</p>
<p>Recently I heard some words of wisdom — ironically, at a marketing best practices conference. &#8220;Why do we come to these conferences, learn what everyone else is doing, and then go home and copy them. Why do we <em>follow</em>, when we should <em>lead</em>.&#8221;</p>
<p>So how does this apply to you and wanting a piece of the social media action? Simply put, all of these new channels — Twitter, Facebook, MySpace, YouTube (to pick a few low-hanging fruits) — are more than just items on a checklist. Want a Facebook page? It can be created in 10 minutes. Same with creating profiles or accounts on all of those other sites. If you want to be a follower, the good news is that it doesn&#8217;t take long to establish a simple presence on these channels. You can probably spend the better part of a day creating accounts on all prevalent networks and community sites and cross a BIG item off of that beloved checklist.</p>
<p>But what if you want to lead? What if you want these channels to actually work for you?</p>
<p>Then you are ready to realize a simple truth — social media is a means not an end. Creating presences on these channels is not the item on your checklist but rather a means for accomplishing an even bigger item on your checklist — developing greater brand engagement with your customers and potential customers. Checklists aren&#8217;t bad by nature (I use a ton of them to keep several different things straight). Often it&#8217;s what&#8217;s on them that&#8217;s wrong.</p>
<p>Using &#8216;greater brand engagement&#8217; as your goal, how can you use social media as a means to help you achieve that? Which social channels would best support these goals? Too often marketers grab all of these sites off the rack regardless of how well they support their business&#8217; goal. Maybe a photo-sharing presence on Flickr would be better than a blog for your business. Maybe Facebook isn&#8217;t right for you. In order to answer these questions you first need to know <em>what</em> you are doing.</p>
<p>We are currently working on a project for a client that I cannot wait to share with you that does all of these things. We have a branding/messaging goal for the client and are building the means for accomplishing this through social media. More on this when we can share it but leading produces a greater sense of satisfaction than following.</p>
<p>In the meantime, ask yourslef if you have a social media strategy or just a checklist? Are following or leading?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.westerad.com/2009/06/why-you-need-a-social-media-strategy-not-a-checklist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why We Tweet for Clients</title>
		<link>http://www.westerad.com/2009/05/why-we-tweet-for-clients/</link>
		<comments>http://www.westerad.com/2009/05/why-we-tweet-for-clients/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 22:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Westergaard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.westerad.com/?p=940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, it&#8217;s true. We tweet or ghost tweet for some of our clients. But this post isn&#8217;t meant to be self-promotional but rather a study of social media habits and their adoption by small businesses. This has been a subject of some controversy and discussion, as many view social media — especially Twitter — as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-941" title="3389655485_c981a3e973" src="http://www.westerad.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/3389655485_c981a3e973.jpg" alt="3389655485_c981a3e973" width="270" height="319" />Yes, it&#8217;s true. We tweet or ghost tweet for some of our clients. But this post isn&#8217;t meant to be self-promotional but rather a study of social media habits and their adoption by small businesses. This has been a subject of some controversy and discussion, as many view social media — especially Twitter — as a place for openness and transparency and thus not the bailiwick of your traditional advertising agency.</p>
<p>I agree with those sentiments in general. However they are black and white and, as we know, the modern world is rarely that cut and dry. Truth be told, in medium- to large-sized  businesses where you are often deep with marketing staff, you could and perhaps should keep social media duties in-house, as you have more than enough marketers to navigate most new media channels. But in several small businesses including many that we work with there aren&#8217;t <em>any</em> staff members dedicated to the full-time marketing of the brand. Many of these businesses understand the impact of new media and know that they need to have a presence in these channels but they don&#8217;t always have the time, tools, or personnel to get there. That&#8217;s where we come in.</p>
<p>The other way in which we don&#8217;t fit the black and white rules mentioned above is that in a lot of ways we are different from traditional agencies. First, we are purposefully small. We don&#8217;t have deep hierarchies of our own with account people and creatives. Our account people are our creatives and vice versa. We are deeply involved in almost every aspect of telling our clients&#8217; stories. We also work closely with our clients in ways that many agencies don&#8217;t. We&#8217;re involved in long-term planning and analysis. In many ways we are an off-site marketing team for a handful of businesses.</p>
<p>So having blurred these lines and qualified ourselves as relevant Twitter admins for our clients I will say there are rules that we have created (and continue to create). If asked, we are clear about who we are and who we are not. We don&#8217;t create an identity that&#8217;s not true. We tweet as the business or brand itself and never as &#8216;Nick from INSERT BUSINESS HERE.&#8217; We also work to relay all true social media inquiries directly to staff to ensure a timely and relevant response.</p>
<p>Perhaps our most prescient guiding principle in working with our clients on social media projects is best related through the classic saying <em>— Give a man a fish and you&#8217;ve fed him for today</em>. <em>Teach a man to fish and you&#8217;ve fed him for a lifetime.</em> Our long-term social media goal is to teach our clients to fish. And that&#8217;s where the open nature of social media comes in handy — for collaboration. Twitter makes it easy to share the work of tweeting via <a href="https://cotweet.com/">CoTweet</a> and other similar platforms used by <a href="http://twitter.com/ford">Ford</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/starbucks">Starbucks</a> and <a href="http://twitter.com/wholefoods">Whole Foods</a>. On Facebook, you can assign as many page admins as you want to share the work.</p>
<p>Do you need a social media strategy for your business? Absolutely. Is there one strategy for all businesses small and large? Of course not. In short we tweet for our clients because we are teaching them to fish and guiding them along the journey. And because it&#8217;s not a black and white world with black and white business/agency lines. So that&#8217;s our theory. What&#8217;s yours?</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 85%;"><span style="font-style: italic;">Photo credit netzkobold via Flickr<br />
</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.westerad.com/2009/05/why-we-tweet-for-clients/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Say It with Video</title>
		<link>http://www.westerad.com/2009/03/say-it-with-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.westerad.com/2009/03/say-it-with-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Westergaard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer testimonials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viddler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.westerad.com/?p=639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In our last post we talked about our mantra for employing online video (borrowing a bit from the folks at FTD) — say it with video. We took some of our own advice and used video for our newly added client stories. When faced with how to present client testimonials there are many options — [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.westerad.com/client-stories/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-644" title="video0011" src="http://www.westerad.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/video0011.jpg" alt="video0011" width="508" height="213" /></a>In our last <a href="http://www.westerad.com/2009/03/how-schools-can-use-social-media/">post</a> we talked about our mantra for employing online video (borrowing a bit from the folks at FTD) — <em>say it with video</em>. We took some of our own advice and used video for our newly added <a href="http://www.westerad.com/client-stories/">client stories</a>. When faced with how to present client testimonials there are many options — quotes, case studies, etc. In the end, we thought the most powerful words would come directly from our clients via video. While video on websites cannot replace text universally, you should take a step back and review your content and see where video might offer you a chance to put a unique and personal touch on your message. Your privacy policy and contact page? Probably not. But what about a quick video about your financing processes or other technicalities that customers frequently have questions about? Say it with video.</p>
<p>Of course client stories are a great fit and we are very excited to share these first two with you from Mark Hummel of Hummel&#8217;s Nissan and Barry Smith of Peoples Trust &amp; Savings Bank. We hope to add more of these in the future. <a href="http://www.westerad.com/client-stories/">Client Stories &gt;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.westerad.com/2009/03/say-it-with-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6 Things You Need to Know About the New Facebook</title>
		<link>http://www.westerad.com/2009/03/6-things-you-need-to-know-about-the-new-facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.westerad.com/2009/03/6-things-you-need-to-know-about-the-new-facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick Westergaard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.westerad.com/?p=457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you were on Facebook this past weekend you no doubt noticed some changes. About a week or two ago those of us with Facebook (fan) pages were invited to transition our content over to the new format. Late last week regular &#8220;profile&#8221; users were migrated to the much discussed new homepage. Whatever your personal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-458" title="new-fb-blog001" src="http://www.westerad.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/new-fb-blog001.jpg" alt="new-fb-blog001" width="296" height="214" />If you were on Facebook this past weekend you no doubt noticed some changes. About a week or two ago those of us with Facebook (fan) <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Coralville-IA/Westergaard-Advertising/138113135064?ref=nf">pages</a> were invited to transition our content over to the new format. Late last week regular &#8220;profile&#8221; users were migrated to the much discussed new homepage. Whatever your personal opinion is (though one of my favorite friend status updates from the weekend was &#8216;Where IS everything?!!! Curse you facebook!&#8217;) there are some exciting developments that marketers utilizing Facebook should know about &#8230;</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Pages = Profiles </strong>As you can see, <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Coralville-IA/Westergaard-Advertising/138113135064?ref=nf">pages</a> for organizations and businesses now look more like profile pages. This is a good update for brands with pages as the old layout was clunky and difficult to update and leverage. This means your business can have status updates that are supposed to start appearing in fans news feeds soon (no word from Facebook on when &#8217;soon&#8217; is). This also means that your page will feature profile-like tabs for users to easily navigate plus a wall for you and your fans to interact. Very cool as all of this allows for more frequent interaction with your fans — giving you the potential to build even stronger brand advocates via Facebook.</li>
<li><strong>The Need for Speed</strong> Definitely a behind-the-scenes update but you will notice it instantly. The &#8216;new&#8217; Facebook features news feeds that are updated pretty close to real time vs. every 10 minutes as before. So users will now be even more in-tune to the goings on in their network.</li>
<li><strong>Cutting the Clutter</strong> So with all of this new info coming at users much faster than before the logical progression will be that the quantity of updates will increase as well. To protect against this new onslaught of info, users can now create filters on their homepage (now being called a &#8217;stream&#8217; like that other social site that starts with a &#8216;T&#8217; &#8230;) in an effort to cut through clutter.</li>
<li><strong>Relevancy Rules </strong> What do filters mean for you? If you start spamming your fans you could get banished to that filter they never check. However, if you keep your messaging relevant then you could make your way into a more frequently monitored filter. Like email — and most online marketing anymore which is becoming more personal by the minute — relevancy is king.</li>
<li><strong>Face Time</strong> Making pages more like profiles and moving to an almost real-time news feed means that you will probably have to increase your time investment in Facebook. Gone are the days when you could set up a fan page and watch it grow like a garden. You&#8217;ll need to get in there and prune it more regularly to keep your updates in this bigger and more competitive &#8217;stream&#8217; high on the wall.</li>
<li><strong>More Metrics</strong> In addition to the general fan counts page admins had before, you&#8217;ll know get more rich metrics on comments, posts, etc. More measurement is always a good thing especially since the new Facebook may require a bit more time thus giving you a better handle on your ROI.</li>
</ol>
<p>So as you can see, for marketers, these updates are very advantageous though they seem to be raising the ire of many Facebook users. Unlike the toppled terms revision of last month, these updates are probably here to stay as Facebook searches for ways to stay competitive with Twitter and, like all social media sites, strives to monetize.</p>
<p>What do you think of the new Facebook changes? Is it too much like Twitter or just the natural evolution of the online conversation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.westerad.com/2009/03/6-things-you-need-to-know-about-the-new-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
